-->
I
agree to a great extent that digital media affects the music
industry significantly. Why put the
question in your essay? – this bit is the answer. Services
such as social networks, youtube and MP3 downloads have changed the
music industry positively and negatively at the same time. But
why – outline your argument. Read the question – it is asking
you about consumption of music, so what is positive & what is
negative? Piracy? Prosumers? Beck? 2 sentences not using the
question to pad it out please.
Indie
companies are now more rife??? as promotion, production and exchange
now cost a lot less. This is due to some digital services (such
as... examples?) with many users are free to use by anyone
for no cost at all. Examples are youtube, twitter and myspace of
what? What is your Point? Where
is the “Explanation” that should follow “Example”?
Indie labels such as XL have used twitter (a social network) to
promote one of the vampire weekend gigs on a free
youtube livestream to their niche fanbase. The livestream got
thousands of views in total by people all over the world, giving not
only the band promotion but the livestream service and the indie
label (XL Records).This is a form of synergy as the bands music got
promoted on another form of media, youtube. But
how does this answer the question? – why is this relevant to your
argument or your answer? – it is factually correct but there is no
“Point” made. In comparison to another gig performance by
the X factor former winners their gig was not live streamed for
free at all. This can also show that the indie labels are more
focused on gaining a more personal, intimate relationship with their
niche audience rather than the money. But how
does this comparison show this – just because they don;t stream
live gigs online – what is a better example of how Majors are
after money – your case Study is Xfactor & One Direction but
neither are addressed here. Another indie label WARP used two
digital medias (which/what artists?) to
promote a new album, one of the songs featured on the album was used
in the introduction of a new film, the whole album was also uploaded
onto youtube for anyone around the world to listen to. Not
specific examples On the subject of global availability (when
did we change to this subject – you've not introduced this before
– what has it got to do with the question – is this relevant?)
domino records has a radio station that also allows anyone in
the world to listen to which can lead to worldwide exposure for
bands and artists. Most independent labels also offer their fans to
buy vinyls instead of MP3, which can turn them from fans into
prosumers if they choose to use the vinyl to remix the song. What
is the point of this Case Study – what are you comparing it to &
what point are you trying to make – Explanation?
Xfactor
sells their contestants live performances on iTunes for people to
buy, this is an easy way to gain money from their mainstream
audience. Why do they buy it when they can
just steal it? Xfactor use social networks, (no
they don't you phone in...) which are world wide and
extremely popular, to allow their fans to vote for contestants to
stay in the competition. The X factor competition also allows their
fans to give them feedback on certain contestants on these social
network sites, Facebook has a like button which X factor uses to
gauge an artist/band popularity. Good – but
you must develop this to address the question – which mentioned
Consumption – Participatory Audience? X factor will put a
picture of a contestant up with the description "like if you
thought JLS's performance was good this week", this shows how
certain institutions use social media to see what is popular at the
moment. This process is also similar to what the indie labels do to
see wether an artist it popular. But how is
this changing consumption?
Sony
also sells all their music on iTunes which allows fans to listen to
their favourite artist on iPhones and mp3 players on the go, digital
technology has allowed people to listen to music whenever they want.
But the internet has opened the doors for people to pirate music of
major conglomerates like Sony. Digital technology has also sapped
money from the music industry through pirating, this has lead to
companies like Sony to loose money, therefor now money can be put
into finding new talent. This has lead to an argument as to wether
music nowadays is more bland and stale due to the constant recycling
of artists. Good Conglomerates can no
longer fund money for new less mainstream artists as they might not
make money, they cannot take the risk as money is being taken away
through the use of digital pirating.It is now up to the indie labels
to produce less mainstream artists.This is a negative example of how
digital technology has affected the music industry. Some
sense of argument coming in here – right at the end. Your argument
should be clear from the start & the essay backs it up?
Not
much range in your examples – One Direction?
What
about Beck?
What
about Prosumers?
Surely
these are more radical ways of distributing the music & the
audience not just consuming it – you have actually done this
yourself...strange that you would not even refer to this and focus
so much on Indies?
AEE
- 13
EX
- 12
T
– 5
30/50C3
No comments:
Post a Comment