Showing posts with label Arguments. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Arguments. Show all posts

Tuesday, 24 April 2012

Part of the Party? Fan & Participatory Music Culture

A Part of the Party!? Fan-culture on the web 2.0 as             a way towards a participatory music culture
The World Wide Web is a place of freedom: of free speech, free choice and of free creative expression. The latter     is becoming increasingly observable ever since the Web 2.0 is available to the Internet-users. The second generation of the web has given people the freedom to put their own content online with only few restrictions. According to media theorist Henry Jenkins (2006) this user-generated content has led to a phenomenon called convergence culture. Three concepts are the buzz words of convergence culture: media convergence, participatory culture and collective intelligence. With the first Jenkins refers to a media landscape that is mixing old and new media, as for instance showing and watching TV series online. The second and third are about the interaction of the consumers with the producer and with each other. They do this without knowing the effect and where “grassroots and corporate media intersect” (Jenkins, 2006, p. 2). All of this is also expressed in fan culture, which is merging all sorts of media and content and is very grassroots, participatory and collective. Relating convergence culture to music culture in the Web 2.0, one could claim that they will shift the passiveness of the music consumer to a more active and participatory involvement. It could function as a space for expressing the fans’ needs rather than being influenced by the music marketers. In the following I will examine in how far convergence can be a way towards a more participatory music business and culture and how marketers can learn from the music culture online.                        

Of all fan-products I found, looking for fan culture on the Web 2.0, the most interesting subjects were located on the video platform YouTube. Other communities and networks as MySpace, Facebook[1] and LastFM[2] give room to promote one’s favourite artist[3], but the creativity is often limited due to the preset character of the platforms. The works I discovered on YouTube spoke of rather unlimited creativity. Those were:
Fan-alternatives to original music clips. For instance, a SecondLife version to the song Jein by the German Hip Hop act Fettes Brot



So-called ‘mash ups’ merging videos and songs of famous musicians, as the mix of Oasis’s Wonderwall and Green Day's Boulevard of Broken Dreams



The merging of cuts from movies with popular songs. For example, a Star Wars version of Snow Patrol’s Chasing Cars


 The creation of completely new music videos, as the very artsy remix of Madcon’s Beggin, not only remixing the video but also the entire song . 


These are only a few examples of how fans have used media convergence to promote their celebrities. This type of convergence, mixing various musical genres and creating videos to it, is also called ‘remix culture’. Lawrence Lessig (2004), the inventor of the term, calls for a culture in which different types of media-mate
rial should be mixed in order to open up the production of culture to everyone and making it more participatory. Convergence allows for this remix culture as it implies a cultural shift, which makes people look for new sources of information and connect the content of media that usually do not seem to fit, as the abovementioned examples show. According to Jenkins (2006), fans are generally the early adopters of new media technologies. They are also “the most active segment of the media audience” (p. 131) and hence do not appreciate the dictation of the music industry. Moreover, Jenkins states that “the web provides them with a powerful new channel for amateur cultural production” (p. 131). Thus, it seems natural that they have  already invaded the Web 2.0 and exploit its opportunities to generate         Simon Moretti feat. J.M. Armleder - Remix 2003       their own content. The online grassroots efforts of fandom become an             Source: Galerie chez Valentin 2003
answer to the dominance of the mass media. They are hoped to create a participatory music culture that finally gives a voice to the consumers in the music business.

Some bands have already used this potential for their own purposes. The American alternative-rock band Incubus, for instance, started the I Dig Incubus competition in late 2006. The task was for their fans to create a video clip to their song Dig and then post it on YouTube. The winner entry was to become the official clip to the song. The result was quite a substantial amount of entries that were not only very creative but also served as an expression of the fans’ commitment to the band. The competition is a symbol for how convergence culture can also be used by bands (and quite probably their management and marketers) to promote themselves and their products. However, whereas there is no doubt that a musical fan culture exists on the Web 2.0, it must be asked whether it really provides the consumers with participation in the shaping of a music culture according to their needs. The term ‘participatory’ would require that the consumers become involved in the process of production and marketing of products connected to music that has so far been the domain of the music industry . According to Jenkins, the cultural fan-works can only achieve marketability if they can obtain collective meaning. The Internet has provided a platform to the fan culture that can distribute those cultural artefacts and help them to be adopted by the rest of the fan community.

The leaders of the music industry will eventually be forced to pay attention to their customers’ desires. As Jenkins explains, TV producers have already started to listen to their series’ fans to adopt their programmes according to their needs. Furthermore, the dialogue with the consumers through the Web 2.0 is even called the Future of Marketing by the Economist Intelligence Unit (2006) – a leading economics research unit. The researchers found out that marketers will have to incorporate online efforts of web-users as well as the merging of offline and online media into their strategies. Through this they will be able to achieve a more holistic branding that is participatory and that suits the medium. Their advice is to get into a dialogue with the consumers through the user-generated content on the Internet. Moreover, following Holt’s (2004) theory on cultural branding, marketers should be able to understand the social tensions of an era and adjust their product according to them. For the music industry that means that it must be assessed what the place of music as a product and brand is within the current music culture. An instance for such a tension is the consumers’ reluctance to pay for music and the overall negative attitude towards the major labels. The marketers would need to find out how the knowledge about this tension could help the music market out of its dip.

 Winner video of the I Dig Incubus competition

Furthermore, Holt also attaches importance to the consumers’ role as authors of cultural content and brands. For him especially those have an influence, which are immersed in what he calls “populist content”. According to Jenkins (2006), those who are involved in the creation of fan-culture usually are immersed in such content. Thus, marketers should accept that fans are necessary to shape the music culture and business in order for them to profit. If this view on fan-culture is really adopted by the music-marketers in the future, then the participation and integration of the grassroots-level of the music culture will be possible in the music business. It is possible that this way the ongoing process of alienation of the music consumers by the music industry will come to an end or will at least be slowed down. Ideally the consumers would feel that they are part of a culture that is very important to them.


Notes
[1] A social network, mainly to connect friends.

[2] An online radio, presenting related artists to the listener, when entering the name of one’s favourite artist.

[3] See The “Do it yourself” guide to stardom on the promoting effects of MySpace.

Sunday, 25 March 2012

Case Study: Music Soundscapes & Visualisation of Music













Chase & Status Feat Plan B

End Credits 

Remix

Case Study Would I Lie to You? Syco & Sony & Visualisation of Music


































Syco Entertainment
Syco Entertainment is a joint venture between Simon Cowell and Sony Music Entertainment.  
SYCO TV co-produces The X Factor and Got Talent. Local versions of The X Factor format air in over 45 countries and The X Factor (USA) is broadcast in 162 countries. Artists launched through The X Factor series globally have sold over 100 million records achieving more than 110 No 1's; 270 Top 10 and 510 Top 50 records. 







Case Study: Danger Mouse The Grey Album & Mash Ups

Grey Album 









The Grey Album is a mashup album by Danger Mouse, released in 2004. It uses an a cappella version of rapper Jay-Z's The Black Album and couples it with instrumentals created from a multitude of unauthorized samples from The BeatlesLP The Beatles (more commonly known as The White Album). The Grey Album gained notoriety due to the response by EMI in attempting to halt its distribution, despite the fact that both Jay-Z and Sir Paul McCartney said they felt fine with the project.



Production


Brian Burton (Danger Mouse) is quoted as saying:
"A lot of people just assume I took some Beatles and, you know, threw some Jay-Z on top of it or mixed it up or looped it around, but it's really a deconstruction. It's not an easy thing to do. I was obsessed with the whole project, that's all I was trying to do, see if I could do this. Once I got into it, I didn't think about anything but finishing it. I stuck to those two because I thought it would be more challenging and more fun and more of a statement to what you could do with sample alone. It is an art form. It is music. You can do different things, it doesn't have to be just what some people call stealing. It can be a lot more than that."[2]
Burton also commented at length on the creation of the Grey Album in the 2007 Danish documentary "Good Copy Bad Copy, A documentary about the current state of copyright and culture".[3]



Reception and Legacy

Professional ratings
Review scores
SourceRating
Allmusic4.5/5 stars [4]
The Boston Globe(favorable) [5]
Entertainment Weekly(A) [6]
NME(10/10) [7]
Pitchfork Media(7.7/10) [8]
Rolling Stone(favorable) [9]
Spin4.5/5 stars [10]
Stylus(C) [11]
Tiny Mix Tapes4/5 stars [12]
Village Voice(mixed) [13]

Danger Mouse is quoted as saying: "This wasn't supposed to happen... I just sent out a few tracks (and) now online stores are selling it and people are downloading it all over the place." Burton denied being the agent provocateur, saying it "was not my intent to breakcopyright laws. It was my intent to make an art project."[14]
Cultural critic Sam Howard-Spink observed that "The tale of The Grey Album and Grey Tuesday offers a rich case study for the examination of a wide variety of contemporary cultural issues within the context of the 'copyright wars' remix culture and the age of the digital network."[15]
Jonathan Zittrain, professor of Internet law at Harvard Law School, comments that "As a matter of pure legal doctrine, the Grey Tuesday protest is breaking the law, end of story. But copyright law was written with a particular form of industry in mind. The flourishing of information technology gives amateurs and homerecording artists powerful tools to build and share interesting, transformative, and socially valuable art drawn from pieces of popular cultures. There's no place to plug such an important cultural sea change into the current legal regime."[15]
On November 16, 2010, Jay-Z offered his thoughts on the album during an interview on NPR. "I think it was a really strong album. I champion any form of creativity, and that was a genius idea - to do it. And it sparked so many others like it..." [16]
McCartney, unlike most artists, welcomes the thought of being imitated because as the cliché goes, “Imitation is the highest form of flattery.”
His record company, EMI, held a different view. 

More on Grey Tuesday and EMI's legal response



Matthew Rimmer
THE GREY ALBUM: COPYRIGHT LAW AND
DIGITAL SAMPLING
Abstract
In the field of digital sampling, djs have shown a recent enthusiasm for ‘mash-ups’ — new compositions created by combining the rhythm tracks of one song and the vocal track of another. Most famously of all, DJ Danger Mouse remixed the vocals from Jay-Z’s The Black Album and the Beatles’ White Album and called his creation The Grey Album. The Grey Album poses a number of difficult issues regarding copyright law and digital sampling. Does such a ‘mash-up’ go beyond the de minimis use of a copyright work? Is The Grey Album protected by the defence of fair use under copyright law because it provides a
transformative use of copyright works? Can such remixes by compulsorily licensed? Does a ‘mash-up’ raise issues concerning the moral rights of attribution and integrity, which are recognised in Europe and Australia?


A commentator recently observed: ‘The most interesting and entertaining phenomena of the MP3 peer-to-peer is the availability of “mashes” — new compositions created by combining the rhythm tracks of one song and the vocal track of another.’ (Vaidhyanathan, 2004a: 104) The most famous example of a mash-up is The Grey Album. In 2003, DJ Danger Mouse — whose real name is Bruce Burton — remixed the vocals from Jay-Z’s The Black Album and the Beatles’ White Album and called his creation The Grey Album (Young, 2004). He released 3000 promotional copies of the album. The record company EMI, the owner of the rights to the sound recording of White Album, sent cease and desist letters to DJ Danger Mouse and stores such as Fat Beats and hiphop.com, demanding they destroy copies of the album and remove them from their websites. DJ Danger Mouse agreed to cease distribution of The Grey Album. He was quoted as saying, ‘This wasn’t supposed to happen … I just sent out a few tracks [and] now online stores are selling it and people are downloading it all over the place.’ (Reuters, 2004) He denies that he was an agent provocateur: ‘[It] was not my intent to break copyright laws. It was my intent to make an art project.’ (Moody, 2004)
On 24 February 2004, some 170 websites posted copies of The Grey Album on the internet in an act of protest and civil disobedience called ‘Grey Tuesday’. The organisers of the protest, Downhill Battle, declared online: ‘This first-of-itskind protest signals a refusal to let major label lawyers control what musicians can create and what the public can hear.’ (Downhill Battle, 2004) The group affirmed:
41. No. 114 — February 2005

‘We cannot allow these corporations to continue censoring art; we need commonsense reforms to copyright law that can make sampling legal and practical for artists.’ (Downhill Battle, 2004) A survey of the sites that hosted files during Grey Tuesday, and an analysis of filesharing activity on that day, reported that The Grey Album was the number one album in the United States on February 24 by a large
margin. The protestors boasted: ‘Danger Mouse moved more “units” than Norah Jones and Kanye West, with well over 100 000 copies downloaded.’ The album was also actively distributed on peer-to-peer networks, such as Kazaa and Soulseek.

Cultural commentators hailed such online activism as a symbol of democracy’ (Howard-Spink, 2004). In response, EMI and Sony/ATV Publishing instructed their lawyers to stop the distribution of The Grey Album on the internet. J. Christopher Jensen (2004), from the New York law firm Cowan, Liebowitz and Latman, warned the host websites of the album: ‘Any unauthorized distribution, reproduction, public performance, and/or other exploitation of The Grey Album will constitute, among other things, common
law copyright infringement/misappropriation, unfair competition, and unjust enrichment rendering you and anyone engaged with you in such acts liable for all of the remedies provided by relevant laws.’ He demanded that the sites ‘cease and desist from the actual or intended distribution, reproduction, public performance or other exploitation of The Grey Album and any other unauthorized uses of the Capitol
Recordings or any other sound recordings owned and/or controlled by Capitol’.